From b6c5b7d773a1cbce39c66c89e417a52217b51657 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Daniel J. Summers" Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:30:54 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Typo fix --- source/_posts/2021/a-tour-of-myprayerjournal-v3/introduction.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/source/_posts/2021/a-tour-of-myprayerjournal-v3/introduction.md b/source/_posts/2021/a-tour-of-myprayerjournal-v3/introduction.md index 99f38a7..1710115 100644 --- a/source/_posts/2021/a-tour-of-myprayerjournal-v3/introduction.md +++ b/source/_posts/2021/a-tour-of-myprayerjournal-v3/introduction.md @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Around 3 years ago, I wrote an 8-part series called ["A Tour of myPrayerJournal" When [Vue][] v3 was announced, this sounded like a great opportunity, with first-class TypeScript support and a new component syntax that promised better performance and a better developer experience. This past summer, I completed a project with the mature Vue v3 framework, and was generally pleased with the results. Just after I returned to my previously abandoned migration attempt on this project (with early Vue v3 support), I heard about **htmx**. With a few attributes, and a server that can handle a few HTTP headers, you can build an interactive site, with performance rivaling or exceeding that of the typical Single Page Application (SPA) - or, at this point, so they claimed. -I also picked up **LiteDB** on another project over the summer, and it worked well. I thought, why not give these technologies a try, and see if I would like result? +I also picked up **LiteDB** on another project over the summer, and it worked well. I thought, why not give these technologies a try, and see if I would like the result? _(SPOILER ALERT: I did!)_