Make Field constructor functions generic #8

danieljsummers · 2024-09-18T13:35:55Z

danieljsummers commented

2024-09-18 13:35:55 +00:00

F# can upcast types to obj if those types are used in place. However, a string seq (IEnumerable<string> in C#) cannot be upcast to an obj seq (IEnumerable<object>) without mapping each item in the sequence. Making the Field constructor functions generic will allow them to take any object type, and these functions handle the conversion to obj (for In and InArray; others work transparently).

F# can upcast types to `obj` if those types are used in place. However, a `string seq` (`IEnumerable<string>` in C#) cannot be upcast to an `obj seq` (`IEnumerable<object>`) without mapping each item in the sequence. Making the `Field` constructor functions generic will allow them to take any object type, and these functions handle the conversion to `obj` (for `In` and `InArray`; others work transparently).

danieljsummers added 2 commits 2024-09-18 13:35:56 +00:00

Make Field functions generic ae94e364b9

Probably only needed for In/InArray, but implemented for all

Update version for rc5 4a1698e713

danieljsummers self-assigned this 2024-09-18 13:36:02 +00:00

danieljsummers merged commit 740767661c into main

2024-09-18 13:36:15 +00:00

danieljsummers deleted branch v-four-rc5

2024-09-18 13:36:15 +00:00

danieljsummers referenced this issue from a commit

2024-09-18 13:36:16 +00:00

Make Field constructor functions generic (#8)

Sign in to join this conversation.

No reviewers

No Label

No Milestone

No project

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: bit-badger/BitBadger.Documents#8